Supreme Court Makes Major Ruling to Protect Cellphone Privacy | African-American News and Black History

cell phone, cell phone search, cell phone warrant, supreme court, supreme court cell phone ruling, Technology -

Supreme Court Makes Major Ruling to Protect Cellphone Privacy

cell phone, cell phone search, cell phone warrant, supreme court, supreme court cell phone ruling, Technology -

Supreme Court Makes Major Ruling to Protect Cellphone Privacy

cell-phone-ruling

In a major statement on privacy rights in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled that the police need warrants to search the cellphones of people they arrest.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the court, said the vast amount of data contained on modern cellphones must be protected from routine inspection.

The old rules, Roberts said, cannot be applied to “modern cellphones, which are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy.”

The courts have long allowed warrantless searches in connection with arrests, saying they are justified by the need to protect police officers and to prevent the destruction of evidence.

But Roberts said neither justification made much sense in the context of cellphones. On the other side of the balance, he said, is the data contained on the typical cellphone. Ninety percent of Americans have them, he wrote, and they contain “a digital record of nearly every aspect of their lives — from the mundane to the intimate.”

Even the word “cellphone” is a misnomer, he said. “They could just as easily be called cameras, video players, Rolodexes, calendars, tape recorders, libraries, diaries, albums, televisions, maps or newspapers,” he wrote.

Roberts acknowledged that the decision would make law enforcement more difficult.

“Cellphones have become important tools in facilitating coordination and communication among members of criminal enterprises and can provide valuable incriminating information about dangerous criminals,” he wrote. “Privacy comes at a cost.”

The court heard arguments in April in two cases on the issue, but issued a single decision.

source: nytimes.com


Leave a comment

Related Posts

#FlashbackFriday Do you agree or...
#FlashbackFriday Do you agree or...
#FlashbackFriday Do you agree or disagree with the first slide? Please comment your opinion below. _________________...
Read More
Let it be a movement!
@tieeshaessex...
Let it be a movement! @tieeshaessex...
Let it be a movement! @tieeshaessex @tiemonex #BlackExcellence #BlackFamily #BlackCommunity #BlackWoman #Bussit #Bu...
Read More
The lion(s) now have their...
The lion(s) now have their...
The lion(s) now have their own historians, no more do we count on other cultures to be the gate keepers of OUR storie...
Read More
Gods Black Prophets: Deconstructing the...
Gods Black Prophets: Deconstructing the...
Gods Black Prophets: Deconstructing the Myth of the White Muhammad of Arabia and Jesus of Jerusalem by Dr. Wesley Muh...
Read More

Tags